Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Why are we ignorig the "Well Regualted Militia, being necessary for the security of a free state"?

Collapse
X
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Why are we ignorig the "Well Regualted Militia, being necessary for the security of a free state"?

    If anyone who studies the Constitution, Bill of rights and the 2nd Amendment know EVERYTHING these politicians are doing are unconstitutional.

    Well Regulated Militia does not mean RESTRICTIONS on the right of the people to keep and bear arms.

    The phrase "well regulated" was in common use long before 1789, and remained so for a century thereafter. It referred to the property of something being in proper working order, not restricting with 23,000 gun laws, "regulations" and counting, as we speak.

    Congress has the Constitutional power and duty to regulate the 2nd Amendment by "ARMING THE PEOPLE" not "disarming" or "restricting" which is an "infringement" establishing a constructional disability, or absence of power. A direct limitation on Congress itself.

    'A well regulated Militia' is constitutional 'homeland security' based upon 'the right of the people to keep and bear Arms'


    If the Militia IE 2A may have to “repel invasions” ART I, S 8, CL 15, they would possess Arms at least equivalent to any potential invaders. 2A "champions" overlook this and have been for decades.

    This isn't about "safety", Hunting or even individual self defense.

    The Militia is being disarmed every day folks.


    I carry a firearm because a cop is too heavy and takes too many breaks.

    Montani Semper Liberi - (Mountaineers Are Always Free)
Working...
X